News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Fielding stands by alcopop tax block 

Fielding stands by alcopop tax block

19 Mar, 2009 12:11 PM
Family First senator Steve Fielding is not backing away from his decision to scuttle the government's tax hike on alcopops.

But he said there was nothing stopping the government from proceeding with the measures to tackle binge drinking it had negotiated with the Senate crossbench.

The government has collected nearly $300 million from the 70 per cent tax hike on ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages it imposed by regulation in May last year.

"What has has happened is that they have hidden behind a tax grab for 11 months, conning Australia and at the 11th hour they have put a few measures in place," Senator Fielding told reporters.

The Family First senator says binge drinking is not a tax problem.

"It's a culture problem and breaking the back and the link between alcohol and sport is absolutely critical for all Australian families."

The government on Wednesday rejected Senator Fielding's "lifeline" amendment to ban alcohol advertising during sports telecasts from 2012.

Opposition health spokesman Peter Dutton says the government should immediately introduce legislation to prevent the revenue being returned to the liquor industry.

"It would be a disgrace if (prime minister) Kevin Rudd for political reasons decided to give that money back," Mr Dutton told reporters.

The government had the power to retain the money provided the legislation was passed by Friday.

"The legal advice is very clear ... the government ... has to validate it this sitting period ... so the money doesn't have to go back."

Labor backbencher Darren Cheeseman says the government wanted to ensure the price of alcopops was kept high.

The price of ready-to-drinks is expected to drop by up to $1.30 after the tax hike ceases.

"They (the opposition) are trying to do a big favour for the big distillers in this industry and it's not acceptable," he told reporters.

Australian Greens leader Bob Brown says the coalition is as much to blame as Senator Fielding for the legislation failing.

"All of them made a muck-up of a perfectly straight forward measure and have dismissed an extremely good array of measures to combat alcoholism," he told reporters.

Senator Brown said the government now needed to move speedily to introduce legislation on Thursday to ensure the collected tax gained was not returned to the distillers.

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon said Senator Fielding should have folded on Wednesday and accepted a very comprehensive package of measures which would have shifted the culture of binge drinking.

"My plea to Steve Fielding is to reconsider his position," he said.

Labor Senator Doug Cameron said the opposition and Senator Fielding's sinking of this measure was absolutely ridiculous.

"Every health professional who has commented on this has said clearly that this was an outrageous proposition," he said.

Liberal frontbencher Andrew Robb said the hike was just a tax, adding it was a money grab by Labor.

"It had nothing to do with binge drinking, nothing to do with young men who are the major problem with binge drinking," he told reporters.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1



RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Thank you Steve for holding your ground. I am pleased the tax has been beaten because young drinkers need premixed drinks so they can control what they are drinking. I have three young adults and i much prefer they drink premixed drinks rather than mix their own or worse still allow someone else to mix them. As for the governments refusal to move legislation to keep the revenues already raised, that is simply childish and they are looking for reasons to point the finger at the opposition for the huge budget deficiet we will no doubt have this year. Grow up and get on with your job Wendy!!
Posted by Christina, 19/03/2009 12:09:18 PM
Perhaps the Family First Partyshould change its name to the Alcohol First Party with the motto "the family that binges together dies together".
Posted by wallaby, 19/03/2009 12:09:24 PM
Good riddance to bad policy! I can't believe our parlimentarians spent a whole year debating this illconceived policy. Anyone with half a brain would realise young adults with limited income will simply choose another cheaper drink of choice to binge on. This was never going to reduce young adults/teenagers drinking too much. Another KRUDD policy.
Posted by FJ, 19/03/2009 12:28:05 PM
The baby went out with the bathwater on this one.
Posted by ricci, 19/03/2009 12:47:47 PM
Fantastic!!! Cheaper alcohol for us all! Its a day to be merry thats for sure. Steve Fielding: We salute you!
Posted by Peter, 19/03/2009 1:06:49 PM
Ok, so the immediate effect is that alcohol is cheaper for young adults. Not that good, but there are plenty of other ways to get drunk, so no major. In my opinion Fielding is correct to hold out - sport got away from tobacco advertising without too much trouble, despite all the laments, and we all know what most of us think of smoking now - so why can't sport get on without alcohol advertising -- especially with all the problems caused by alcohol and sport role models (even if some sportsmen are so clever they can't understand what a role model is!). So Fielding gets my approval, good to see someone with principles trying to stand up for them.
Posted by Bruce, 19/03/2009 1:37:50 PM
I agree with Ricci's comment. Quite frankly money has to come from somewhere if we want to fund support programs to help change the culture of binge drinking that Senator Fielding seems so intent on railing against. Even if it was just a mere tax grab, considering how pent up the opposition are over government debt, it is absurd to then decry any measure aimed at plugging that deficit!
Posted by Matthew, 19/03/2009 2:39:21 PM
Yep, someone was feeling a little unnoticed in the media... "Family First- Please Please Please look at me!" Just so happens that it fits with the excellent tasting brand of Conservatism that has haunted the US for the past 8 years that Family First seems so intent on adopting.
Posted by Shiny Flu, 19/03/2009 7:41:57 PM
Thank you Senator Fielding, we desperately need pre-mixed drinks that, unlike beer, wine or spirits, taste terrific and are within easy reach of young people, especially the 14 year age group, as Australian culture demands we drink ourself silly. Your plan, I suspect, is to support our alcohol retailers because as the older drinkers slowly die off, mainly due to liver failure, they can "hook" the pre-teen drinker with cheep, but very tasty pre-mixed alcoholic beverages. Now that my kids don't have to pool their pocket money, between their mates, to buy expensive bottles of whisky and stuff around mixing them they are much happier, so they also thank you. Well done and I look forward to your next progressive venture. Maybe you may consider introducing a private bill to increase tax on health food and use it as a funeral concession for future alcoholics who kick started their career by gradually acquiring a taste for alcohol on the pr-mixed drinks bandwagon. I cant thank you and your liberal mates enough. A tip: now is a good time to buy shares in the alcohol beverage market.
Posted by Dave, 20/03/2009 4:56:27 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Senator Steve Fielding
Senator Steve Fielding
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
University of Canberra - click here
 
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...