News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Gillard wins battle over construction industry rules 

Gillard wins battle over construction industry rules

17 Jun, 2009 12:00 AM
Workplace Relations Minister Julia Gillard has steamrollered opposition from unions and some in the Labor caucus over legislation that will keep a ''tough cop on the beat'' in the construction industry.

The legislation abolishes the Howard-era Australian Building and Construction Commission, a Labor election promise, and implements the recommendations of an inquiry led by Justice Murray Wilcox.

New safeguards for workers' rights will be introduced in the legislation, but building workers can be compelled to testify about workplace practices under threat of six months' jail.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Ms Gillard championed the legislation at an exhaustive 212 hour caucus meeting.

Three amendments designed to further soften the legislation had been proposed by former union chief Doug Cameron and ACT senator Kate Lundy, but all three amendments were defeated.

Mr Rudd said the legislation ensured better legal protections for workers required to testify about illegal industry practices.

He dismissed concerns from the union movement.

''Complaints from the union movement, complaints from industry would probably suggest that the Government has got the balance right in acting in the national interest,'' he said.

Ms Gillard said the new laws would have a sunset clause of five years, and that good behaviour would be rewarded via an opt out ''for projects that have good industrial behaviour and a good record''.

An independent assessor would decide what constituted good behaviour, she said.

''We have also accepted his [Justice Wilcox's] recommendation that the exercise of the coercive powers and the hearings that result should be videotaped, the videotape provided to the Ombudsman and the Ombudsman should periodically report on the conduct of those hearings,'' she said.

''We have also accepted his recommendation that a person required to attend for a coercive powers hearing should have all of their costs wages lost, travel, and the costs of a lawyer met.''

Senator Cameron and Senator Lundy had proposed a three-year sunset clause on the coercive powers available in the legislation.

They had also called for an opt-in rather than opt-out system for building sites, and a tougher test before coercive powers were used.

Senator Lundy, who maintains strong connections with the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, said she was disappointed, but accepted the decision of the caucus.

The legislation will be introduced into the House of Representatives today, but passage of the legislation could be delayed in the Senate, as the Greens have indicated they will seek an inquiry into the new laws.

Australian Council of Trade Unions secretary Jeff Lawrence denied union concerns had been all-but ignored by the Government.

But he conceded that unions still had a ''fundamental problem'' with some aspects of the Bill, which discriminated against construction workers.

''This law does provide for some improvements, but it still maintains those coercive powers and we don't think that is fair or appropriate,'' he said.

''Once the legislation is passed, unions and the ACTU will be looking at how this legislation is utilised.''

The Australian Industry Group cautiously welcomed the legislation but warned it would need to examine the detail.

Group chief Heather Ridout said capitulation to union pressure would be ''very negative'' for industry.

''When the details of the new rules are made public today they will need to be assessed to ensure that they are workable for business and do not water down the important powers of the construction industry watchdog,'' she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

Most popular articles

University of Canberra Arts-Design



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...