News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Keating calls for privacy law change 

Keating calls for privacy law change

02 Nov, 2009 10:08 AM
Enraged by what he regards as an invasion of his family's privacy, former prime minister Paul Keating has called for the rewriting of Australia's privacy laws.

His proposal would require media organisations to gain a person's permission before publishing a photograph or a story deemed to involve their private life.

Demanding a crackdown on the way media organisations operate, Mr Keating said that, outside of official functions and public interest considerations, newspapers and other media should not be permitted to photograph or report on any person without their consent.

''Matters for which there is no public right to know ought to be the preserve of the citizenry in its privacy,'' Mr Keating said.

''That includes details of their personal lives, altercations in marriages, love affairs, compromising photographs taken of them privately without their consent. These are all matters that should be off-limits for newspapers and other media.''

Mr Keating was speaking after an article in yesterday's Sunday Telegraph alleged that his daughter, Katherine, had kicked one of the newspaper's photographers at a social event at the State Theatre and said to the photographer: ''Do you want me to throw you down the stairs and kill you?''

Through her father, Ms Keating denied the claims, accusing the journalist who wrote it of ''wilful misrepresentation''.

But her denial has prompted a furious response from the chairman and chief executive of News Limited, John Hartigan, who accused Ms Keating of lying and Mr Keating of being motivated by self-interest in his call for privacy law reform.

''Frankly, it is difficult to stomach the hypocrisy of Paul Keating,'' Mr Hartigan said.

''What we have now is a man calling for a new law so that people like him can use their wealth, power and privileged positions to avoid scrutiny when it suits them, while remaining happy to exploit the media for their own gain at other times.''

Mr Keating did not deny his daughter was angry at being photographed, but said she denied kicking the photographer and alleged that she was ''ambushed'' by several photographers at the event.

But Mr Hartigan said it was Ms Keating who needed to account for her actions. ''Her claim she neither assaulted or threatened our staff on Friday night is a lie,'' he said.

The Age

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Who is Keating to comment? He's not the Prime Minister now, and has no respect for Canberra as the true Capital city of Australia. Why are you giving him a voice?
Posted by Canberrans against Keating's Sydneyhood, 2/11/2009 10:47:43 AM
Humbug Keating, shame about the daughter, lovely girl!
Posted by ex-Baron of Bruce, 2/11/2009 11:51:22 AM
News Limited: it says it all. I have to agree with Keeting, media prying into people's private lives has just gone too far, particularly when it comes to Murdoch's newspapers.
Posted by Rob, 2/11/2009 12:21:31 PM
I agree. Unless it has a detrimental impact on the community in some way, I think everybody is entitled to a personal life.
Posted by KP, 2/11/2009 1:34:59 PM
I too am on Katharine Keating's side. She was never Prime Minister or Treasurer and having a father who was does not entitle the media to invade her private life. The Oz press are bad enough but the Poms are much worse and I would hate to see us go the same way. People are entitled to their privacy without having cameras shoved in their face. And I am pleased to see Paul Keating sticking up for his daughter.
Posted by MMcI, 2/11/2009 2:18:11 PM
Why didn't the Howard Government do a review of the Privacy Act and it's inadequacies when he was PM? Any recommendations were ignored. It has taken the Rudd Government to make that happen. Perhaps it's because previous government's have loved the "media dirt machine" when it comes to discrediting their opponents in parliament. A legacy of the former Howard Government and it's certainly stooped to new lows over the period and the interim until changes are effected.
Posted by Felix, 2/11/2009 2:42:08 PM
I would go further, demanding that the media colour codes its items so that all the readers/viewers can see the difference between 'fact;, media 'opinion'. 'speculation' or a 'wild arse guess by some reporter seeking his/her moment of fame Give me the facts..I'm intelligent enough to deduce the effects
Posted by maszki1, 4/11/2009 4:31:58 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Enraged ... Paul Keating. Photo: James Alcock
Enraged ... Paul Keating. Photo: James Alcock

MOST POPULAR

Yourguide to Your Toyota
 
James Bond Happy Hour at Flint - click now
 
Red Hot Deals at Eurobodalla! click now
 
University of Canberra - click here
 
Click here to read See Canberra online!
 
Ready, Set. Drive!
 
Classifieds
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...