News 
 National News 
 National 
 General 
 Public service staff 'too flat out' 

Public service staff 'too flat out'

11 Mar, 2009 10:46 AM
The public service is so busy doing the Government's bidding it lacks time to properly check whether its policies actually work, a former top-ranking bureaucrat says.

The former head of the Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts, David Borthwick, said the public service wanted to develop more effective policies, ''but our agencies are so flat out, so stretched, that we have scant capacity to invest in serious thinking''.

Mr Borthwick, who resigned in January after a 36-year career in the bureaucracy, delivered his valedictory address at the National War Memorial last night to an audience of senior public servants.

He said governments were now so captured by the immediate demands of special interest groups and the media that they failed to focus on the nation's needs.

''[More] than ever, governments are reactive to the intense pressure of the 24-hour news cycle. Sadly, responding to the shrill voices of sectoral interests too often gets in the way of long-term policy development in the national interest.''

He said the recent focus on placating media-savvy lobbyists had been the ''most challenging and sometimes frustrating aspect'' of his career.

''Some might say: is there harm in making a few concessions, here and there, to sectoral interests? However, the accumulation of bad decisions or indecision will catch up with nations.''

Mr Borthwick also suggested the public service would gain from being more open.

''Uncomfortable though it may be at times, we need to allow ourselves to be questioned and probed about the quality of service we are delivering on behalf of the Australian people,'' he said.

''Releasing more information into the public domain helps builds trust in government and government processes and, most importantly, it encourages a more open debate on longer-term policy issues.''

Mr Borthwick, the son of Victorian Liberal minister Bill Borthwick, entered the federal public service as a Treasury graduate in 1973, and became a senior executive six years later. He worked in Treasury, Health and Ageing, and Prime Minster and Cabinet before he was appointed Environment secretary in 2004.

His replacement at Environment, former NSW bureaucrat Robyn Kruk, began her job last week.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A story on overworked public servants,I had to check the calender & make sure it wasn't the 1st of April,next they'll be saying they're under-paid,perhaps they should get a job in the private sector or work for themselves & find out what its really like to work hard.
Posted by dusty, 11/03/2009 11:40:59 AM
I wish people would quit their stereo-typical view of public servants. You want to have a day in my shoes Dusty, then tell me I don't work hard!
Posted by Kris, 11/03/2009 12:04:11 PM
Here here Dusty..... those 7.5 hours a day a really tiring....... My heart bleeds.....
Posted by Peter, 11/03/2009 12:20:57 PM
David Borthwick, do what private enterprise do, do it in your own time.
Posted by BT, 11/03/2009 12:25:39 PM
I run a ministerial area for a very busy portfolio. Both under the current and previous government. Yes, it's busy now, but no busier than for the previous government. Yes, the media is a pain in the arse, always has been and always will be. A big part of the public service's role is simply closing the gap for our Minister(s) between what journalists write; and what is really going on. Mind you, I wouldn't want to have been in Mr Borthwick's position. A rock star with an interest in the environment is not necessarily someone best promoted to Cabinet. And yes, you poor bastards in DEWH&A do come in for more than your fair share of silly lobbying by special interest groups. But never forget that one of the SEC's key roles is to gently brief the Minister on how best to handle media (et al) pressure. (i.e., in a cooperative and mature manner at your leisure, rather than at their beck and call)
Posted by James, 11/03/2009 1:03:42 PM
Come and work in the Public Service for a month dusty, you will change your mind. I'm tired of Public Service bashers who have no idea on how hard Public Servants work. Stop bashing us and join us! There is no job security here either, someone is always waiting in the wings for your job.
Posted by what's up, 11/03/2009 1:28:19 PM
what's up - I have worked in both sides and I was shocked to realise how much "downtime" for lunch, morning tea's, drinks etc is wasted evey week... Sure everyone is entitled to a break but you would not survive a week in the private sector...
Posted by Reality, 11/03/2009 2:45:15 PM
Obviously James is so busy he has time (a lunch break) to read the newspaper in the middle of the day and to pen a 200 plus word response. Flat out alright.
Posted by No lunch Break, 11/03/2009 3:15:19 PM
I too have WORKED in the private sector and I had 15 minutes today for lunch and a quick instant coffee at 10:30. I started at 0730 and will most likely finish at 1800 and still won't get it all done. Do more with less that's the cry in the Public Service these days! I know how hard I work, I don't have to justify myself to anyone but myself....good afternoon!
Posted by what's up, 11/03/2009 3:42:31 PM
Ah, the morning tea argument again. I have worked many years in both. I can tell you that in the public sector the hours and job security are comparable to the private sector, the pay and 'perks' are far less (don't expect an annual bonus or lunch on the corporate tab), the responsibility and accountability standards are far higher and the public respect is lower. In any case, you all miss Mr Borthwick's point. This is not about public service working hours. This is about the capability of the public service to develop properly researched, consulted, costed and constructed policy, free from the frivolous influence of current affairs journalists and media-savvy lobbyists who will say anything to embarrass the government or improve ratings. Not all lobbyists are like this, but those that are have become increasingly prevalent and have brought down many ministers. Regardless of whether their spruiking is legitimate or which party is in power, they must be addressed in the interests of political stability and unfortunately this can come at the expense of good policy. I find it hard to disagree with Mr Borthwick on this.
Posted by Joe Bloggs, 11/03/2009 5:35:40 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

LJ Hooker CIty

Feb Buy Smart
 
Feb Best Buys


The Canberra Times







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...