JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Furner wants answers on refs


Jon Tuxworth

Dean Whare of the Sea Eagles scores a try during the round nine NRL match between the Manly Sea Eagles and the Canberra Raiders at Brookvale Oval yesterday.

Dean Whare of the Sea Eagles scores a try during the round nine NRL match between the Manly Sea Eagles and the Canberra Raiders at Brookvale Oval yesterday. Photo: Getty Images

Frustrated Canberra Raiders coach David Furner questioned whether the referees thought the Raiders could win after contentious decisions cost the Raiders dearly in an 18-12 loss to Manly Sea Eagles at Brookvale yesterday.

Furner will ring NRL referees boss Bill Harrigan this week because he ''wants some answers'' after yesterday's loss.

His comments may come under some scrutiny by the NRL, which can slap coaches with a $10,000 fine for criticising or questioning the integrity of referees.

Daniel Harrison of the Sea Eagles is tackled. Click for more photos

Manly Sea Eagles v Canberra Raiders

Manly Sea Eagles v Canberra Raiders at Brookvale Oval on May 6. Photo: Getty Images

While attempting to be diplomatic after the match, Furner was fuming after a couple of late refereeing calls cost his side in the second half.

Not wanting to detract from the Raiders' gutsy effort was possibly the only thing that prevented Furner from unloading both barrels on the officials.

''I think everyone who watched the game, it was pretty obvious there what turned it around, or put us in the situation to lose the game,'' Furner said.

''I don't think anyone expected us to come and here and win, maybe not them [the referees].

''What I look at is the overall penalty count, 8-3 … we're not nearly a three-times worse side in discipline than Manly.

''I don't want to sit here and whinge about the referees because I think it takes away from what I think was a good game. Certainly some of the decisions didn't help us, that's the best way to describe it … you go and have a look and see what was done and whether they [the penalties] were mandatory and needed.''

Pressed on whether he would contact Harrigan this week, Furner replied, ''I don't think it's a waste of time, I think I need to''.

''We've certainly got a good relationship there, but I want some answers.''

Midway through the second half and with Manly ahead 16-12, officials missed a knock-on from Manly winger Jorge Taufua which would have given Canberra an attacking set 20 metres out.

And with three minutes left the Raiders should have received a penalty when lock Shaun Fensom was ruled to have knocked on with his side on the attack.

Replays showed a Manly defender should have been penalised for ruck interference.

''I wasn't real happy about the call,'' Fensom said.

''I played the ball and I played it on to one of their feet, and they've deemed it a knock-on. I can't do anything about that, unfortunately. It was a major call in the game. There were only about five minutes to go and we were on the front foot, only six points behind.''

After conceding an unacceptable 44 points at home to Cronulla last week, Canberra's subsequent attitude adjustment in defence worked wonders.

It scrambled well and missed 26 tackles to Manly's 28, and its positional changes also worked a treat.

After coming off the bench late in the first half, Shaun Berrigan lifted Canberra's attack noticeably at hooker when replacing Travis Waddell.

The Raiders looked far more dangerous with the 34-year-old at dummy half, and Jack Wighton was superb defensively at Berrigan's previous spot right centre.

''Jacko [Wighton] is only a young kid but he handled centre well, and Berro was very creative with his experience around that nine,'' Furner said. ''We put a lot of effort in and didn't get the two points, but we have to make sure we maintain that same attitude, particularly in defence.

''We can't switch off one week and then bring it the next.''

After heavy losses to the Cronulla Sharks and Brisbane Broncos in the past fortnight, the Raiders showed enough to suggest they can recover from their 3-6 start.

They enjoyed plenty of success with short balls around the ruck, and the kicking games of young halves Josh McCrone and Sam Williams improved markedly.

5 comments so far

  • Ah, Furner, if only you had a captain who will question the ref's decision... that's when he's actually on the field of course. Don't know who the vice captain was, but he didn't jump up and down either. BTW, what was Shillo thinking when he went in to dummy half and threw that aweful pass?

    Follow what leader?
    Date and time
    May 07, 2012, 7:45AM
    • Get a life David, the way you carry on your team had be toweled up by about 20 penalties to nil.
      You blokes (coaches) will never be happy until the count is exactly the same for both teams, which generally means the count was rigged or at the very least "evened up".
      Perhaps the Raiders should do their job and play more footy and worry less about what the referee is doing, which by the way is just his job.

      Date and time
      May 07, 2012, 7:52AM
      • Maybe if you could coach then you would not be Mr 39%. If you could coach your team would not drop the ball cold all the time. They woud have a decent kicking game. They would tackle from marker. They would move up on their line instead of slideing and maybe just maybe you would use one hooker and pick a center that is not afraid to tackle.

        Date and time
        May 07, 2012, 8:24AM
        • Normally I would agree with the other comments but on this occasion, even the Manly supporters would have to admit they got away with one.

          Whatever happens, Berrigan needs to be our preferred hooker for the rest of the season.

          Date and time
          May 07, 2012, 9:12AM
          • Im not a fan of either but if I was a raiders supporter I would feel robbed. Both refs need to be looked at it was a very poor display.

            Date and time
            May 07, 2012, 7:43PM

            Make a comment

            You are logged in as [Logout]

            All information entered below may be published.

            Error: Please enter your screen name.

            Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

            Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

            Error: Please enter your comment.

            Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

            Post to

            You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

            Thank you

            Your comment has been submitted for approval.

            Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

            Related Coverage

            Follow Us on Facebook

            Featured advertisers