Balmain stalwart Paul Sironen during the 1989 Grand Final loss to Canberra.
- We won't let the Balmain Tigers die, vow club stalwarts
- Five key questions facing the Wests Tigers
- Ultimate League: It's not too late to sign up for our Fantasy NRL game
Wests Tigers chief Grant Mayer claims the joint-venture club is "not at risk" amid fresh fears the Balmain side of the joint-venture could fold.
The Balmain Tigers Leagues Club is expected to be placed into receivership on Wednesday after taking NSW Supreme Court action against Rozelle Village, a property developer attempting to transform the Tigers' Victoria Road headquarters.
The leagues club owes Rozelle Village approximately $8 million and has allegedly defaulted on a series of loans.
Justice Paul Brereton granted a 24-hour extension just as Rozelle Village was about to call in the auditors, but it appears to be a stay of execution.
Counsel for the leagues club, Robert Newlinds, SC, said the move could "potentially bring to an end an 108-year-old football club".
It also raises broader questions about the future of Wests Tigers, an uneasy alliance between the Balmain and Western Suburbs.
However, Mayer described the court case as being at "arm's length" from the NRL club.
"At this stage, there is nothing the Wests Tigers have to say regarding the situation," he said.
"It is a Balmain Leagues Club issue. Wests Tigers are represented on the board by Balmain Football Club, not the Balmain Leagues Club. Wests Tigers are not at risk."
The developments come at a delicate time given the factions were close to ratifying a historic corporate governance overhaul by the NRL.
Wests and Balmain agreed to a new model of seven directors – three of whom would be independent board members installed by the NRL.
The arrangement would mean the ARLC would cover Balmain's financial shortfall for the next two years but would lose its shares in the joint venture if it couldn't square the ledger within two years.
It's clear after Tuesday's events that will not be possible and that voting rights would also be lost, as there was no way of providing security against the money lent.
It was expected that the NRL would sign off on the new structure within a fortnight, although it's unclear if there will now be delays.
"The Wests Tigers are continuing to go through its governance reforms with the NRL and the two shareholders and we're confident of an outcome very shortly," Mayer said.
"We are completely isolated from the current court proceedings. Therefore to comment further would be irresponsible on my behalf.
"This is an arm's-length court case. We have no involvement with today's proceedings as it's a Balmain Leagues Club issue, not a Wests Tigers issue.
"I'm confident with the process we're going through with the NRL."
One of the safeguards in the deal with the NRL is that the Wests Tigers name will be retained.
An NRL spokesperson said: "The current legal proceedings relate to the Balmain Leagues Club, not the Wests Tigers football club. However the NRL is working with the Wests Tigers to monitor the case and determine if there will be any impact on the football club.
"At this stage it is premature to draw any conclusions as to the likely effect on the Wests Tigers."
While the NRL club will not be changed to Western Suburbs, there are fears the role of Balmain could be negligible.
Wests Ashfield Leagues club had previously sought control of the board in exchange for a $1 million cash injection to prevent Wests Tigers from becoming insolvent last year.
The failure of the leagues club development at Rozelle was one of the factors behind Balmain being burdened with a $9.5 million debt.
NRL boss Dave Smith has previously stated the new board structure could be a blueprint for how other clubs are run and other clubs have already had informal discussions with the league about their own models.
But fans of the Tigers – both the Balmain and Wests variety – will be concerned following the revelations.