JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Arbib calls for alignment between ARU, Super sides

Date

Georgina Robinson

Green light … former Wallaby Nick Farr-Jones supports the review.

Green light … former Wallaby Nick Farr-Jones supports the review. Photo: Anthony Johnson

A ''WORRYING divide'' between the priorities of Super Rugby teams and the Wallabies is killing the success of both and must be bridged if rugby is to survive in Australia, a review of the sport's corporate governance has found.

The review titled, Strengthening the Governance of Australian Rugby, conducted by former federal sports minister Mark Arbib found the ARU and the Super Rugby franchises lacked the alignment needed for rugby to compete against the other football codes in Australia.

''There is currently a worrying divide between the business models of Super Rugby teams and the ARU … As a result, the very structure of Australian rugby has become a factor inhibiting the success of both the national and the Super Rugby teams,'' the report noted. ''Developing mechanisms to overcome this … must become a priority … with all of rugby's stakeholders, if rugby is to succeed.''

ARU chairman Michael Hawker said the board did not necessarily agree with Arbib's comments but recognised it was a view held by a number of people involved in rugby.

''The [review's] recommendations are that the code needs to work more harmoniously and closely together and there's no doubt that the current board is very much looking to endeavour to do that,'' Hawker said.

The review makes 15 recommendations, including that the ARU board be composed entirely of independent directors and that members' voting rights be changed to level the voting power of each state union and to also give each Super Rugby club a vote, plus the players, via the Rugby Union Players Association.

Hawker said such reforms would help unify disparate interests in the sport but ruled out a move towards a centralised operations, similar to those in New Zealand.

Where recent contract wranglings between the ARU and top Wallabies Will Genia and Quade Cooper have exposed weak spots in Australia's player contracting system, the NZRU contracts its players directly, then gives them top-ups if they make national teams.

The Arbib review found Australia's federated structure had exacerbated the divide between the two levels, as well as the sport's rapid transition to professionalism.

Hawker said Australia's geographic challenges and a smaller rugby profile, compared with New Zealand, meant ''central organisation but local delivery'' was the best model.

The reforms will need the backing of the NSW Rugby Union when they are put to a vote, under the existing membership, in December. NSW has a power of veto over any major constitutional or organisational change, while Queensland is the next most powerful stakeholder.

Nick Farr-Jones gave the review a preliminary green light but said he hoped a dilution of the union's voting rights would not pave the way for the rule of minority interests.

He also hoped that financial benefits of the reforms would find their way back into NSW, as it was Australia's biggest rugby breeding ground.

''I trust Michael Hawker and the board that when [rugby does] have the financial capacity, that some of the funding we have lost over recent years returns, and we can start to spread a bit of that among juniors, country and premiership rugby,'' Farr-Jones said.

Related Coverage

Rugby Internationals 2014

Round 1
Sat, 07 JunTimes shown AEST
SAM 18 vs TGA 18 Report Stats
FJI 25 vs ITA 14 Report Stats
NZL 20 vs ENG 15 Report Stats
AUS 50 vs FRA 23 Report Stats
Sun, 08 JunTimes shown AEST
RSA 47 vs WXV 13 Report Stats
ARG 17 vs IRE 29 Report Stats
USA 6 vs SCO 24 Report Stats
CAN 25 vs JPN 34 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 2
Sat, 14 JunTimes shown AEST
SAM 15 vs ITA Report Stats
FJI 45 vs TGA 17 Report Stats
NZL 28 vs ENG 27 Report Stats
AUS 6 vs FRA Report Stats
Sun, 15 JunTimes shown AEST
RSA 38 vs WAL 16 Report Stats
CAN 17 vs SCO 19 Report Stats
ARG 17 vs IRE 23 Report Stats
USA 29 vs JPN 37 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 3
Sat, 21 JunTimes shown AEST
ARG 19 vs SCO 21 Report Stats
FJI 13 vs SAM 18 Report Stats
JPN 26 vs ITA 23 Report Stats
AUS 39 vs FRA 13 Stats
NZL 36 vs ENG 13 Report Stats
Sun, 22 JunTimes shown AEST
RSA 31 vs WAL 30 Report Stats
USA 38 vs CAN 35 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 4
Sun, 29 JunTimes shown AEST
RSA 55 vs SCO 6 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 5
Sun, 02 NovTimes shown AEDT
BAR 36 vs AUS 40 Report Stats
USA 6 vs NZL 74 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 6
Sun, 09 NovTimes shown AEDT
ITA 24 vs SAM 13 Report Stats
ENG 21 vs NZL 24 Report Stats
WAL 28 vs AUS 33 Report Stats
FRA 40 vs FJI 14 Report Stats
IRE 29 vs RSA 15 Report Stats
SCO 41 vs ARG 31 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 7
Sun, 16 NovTimes shown AEDT
ITA 18 vs ARG 20 Report Stats
ENG 28 vs RSA 31 Report Stats
WAL 17 vs FJI 13 Report Stats
SCO 16 vs NZL 24 Report Stats
FRA 29 vs AUS 26 Report Stats
Mon, 17 NovTimes shown AEDT
IRE 49 vs GEO 7 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 8
Sun, 23 NovTimes shown AEDT
ITA 6 vs RSA 22 Report Stats
SCO 37 vs TGA 12 Report Stats
IRE 26 vs AUS 23 Report Stats
WAL 16 vs NZL 34 Report Stats
ENG 28 vs SAM 9 Report Stats
FRA 13 vs ARG 18 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
Round 9
Sun, 30 NovTimes shown AEDT
ENG 26 vs AUS 17 Report Stats
WAL 12 vs RSA 6 Report Stats
View All Fixtures
 
Featured advertisers