JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

'Remove the grey area in sports medicine': UC Pharmacy Head

The Head of Pharmacy at the University of Canberra would like to see the grey area taken away from sports medicine by shifting from a list of banned substances to a list of approved substances.

Speaking after the release of the Australian Crime Commission's findings on the relationship between professional sporting bodies, prohibited substances and organised crime, Dr Greg Kyle thinks policing drugs in sports is very difficult with the current system of a banned substances list.

"If it's not on the list, it's not illegal ... so everything else by default can be used until it's put on the list," he said.

"Where as if it's a list of 'these are the things that are legal' ... it's probably a more easily controlled entity then."

Dr Kyle expressed concern that slight molecular modifications to an illegal or banned substance can technically create a legal substance.

"A slight chemical modification makes it a different chemical entity, therefore it's not the product that's listed in the banned list, therefore it's not illegal until it's added in."

While an 'approved list' could have the potential to become very long, Dr Kyle suggested another way to approach drugs in sport is to classify them in groups.

"It's probably a big change [but you could] say all products that act in this way are illegal unless we say they're legal. So if you look through the classes of drugs you could say all growth hormone variants are illegal, unless we specifically say you can use them."

Dr Kyle admits such a system would be "virtually impossible" for athletes to navigate, but referred to reports coming out suggesting athletes don't necessarily know or monitor what is in the supplements they are given by sports scientists.

"It all comes down to risk verses benefit," he said, expressing concern about the reports of athletes using drugs not approved for use in humans or still in the research stages.

"Taking a drug may look like an easy fix, but there's no such thing as a drug without side effects."

1 comment so far

  • If drugs were out in the open, people would be able to make rational decisions, but they are not. Cheating is rife, the Authorities are loathe to take action so why not legitimise drugs that way everything is in the open and costs would fall.That way everyone would know what they were really up against and train for that event, but then again if I were rigging a bet I would not wish for this to happen. I would want my advantage.

    Date and time
    February 08, 2013, 3:30PM

    Make a comment

    You are logged in as [Logout]

    All information entered below may be published.

    Error: Please enter your screen name.

    Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Please enter your comment.

    Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

    Post to

    You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

    Thank you

    Your comment has been submitted for approval.

    Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

    Related Coverage

    HuffPost Australia

    Featured advertisers