JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Bizarre skeleton leaves UFO hunters and scientists baffled

Date

Richard Stone

Zoom in on this story. Explore all there is to know.

'Ata' has the bone characteristics of a six- or seven-year-old child.

'Ata' has the bone characteristics of a six- or seven-year-old child.

Alien? Subhuman primate? Deformed child? Mummified foetus? The internet is buzzing over the nature of "Ata", a bizarre 12-centimetre-long skeleton featured in a new documentary on UFOs. A Stanford University scientist who boldly entered the fray has now put to rest doubts about what species Ata belongs to. But the mystery is not over.

The story began 10 years ago, when the diminutive remains were reportedly found in a pouch in a ghost town in the Atacama Desert of Chile. Ata ended up in a private collection in Barcelona; producers of the film Sirius latched onto the bizarre mummy as evidence of alien life.

Last year, immunologist Garry Nolan, director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Proteomics Centre for Systems Immunology at Stanford in California, heard about Ata from a friend and contacted the filmmakers, offering to give them a scientific readout on the specimen. They asked him to give it a shot.

The miniature skeleton has  10 ribs instead of the usual 12.

The miniature skeleton has 10 ribs instead of the usual 12.

Among the apparent abnormalities, Ata sports 10 ribs instead of the usual 12 and a severely misshapen skull. "I asked our neonatal care unit how you would go about analysing it. Had they seen this kind of syndrome before?" Nolan says. He was directed to paediatric radiologist Ralph Lachman, co-director of the International Skeletal Dysplasia Registry at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre in Los Angeles. "He literally wrote the book on paediatric bone disorders," Nolan says. Lachman was blown away, Nolan recalls: "He said, 'Wow, this is like nothing I've ever seen before.' "

To study the specimen, Nolan sought clues in Ata's genome. He initially presumed the specimen was tens or hundreds of thousands of years old - the Atacama Desert may be the driest spot on the planet, so Ata could have been preserved for aeons. He consulted experts who had extracted DNA from bones of the Denisovans, an Asian relative of European Stone Age Neandertals. It turned out that their protocols weren't necessary. "The DNA was modern, abundant, and high quality," he says, indicating that the specimen is probably a few decades old.

To the chagrin of UFO hunters, Ata is decidedly of this world. After mapping more than 500 million reads to a reference human genome, equating to 17.7-fold coverage of the genome, Nolan concluded that Ata "is human, there's no doubt about it". Moreover, the specimen's B2 haplotype-a category of mitochondrial DNA - reveals that its mother was from the west coast of South America: Chile, that is.

Meanwhile, after examining X-rays, Lachman concluded that Ata's skeletal development, based on the density of the epiphyseal plates of the knees (growth plates at the end of long bones found only in children), surprisingly appears to be equivalent to that of a six- to eight-year-old child. If that holds up, there are two possibilities, Nolan says. One, a long shot, is that Ata had a severe form of dwarfism, was actually born as a tiny human, and lived until that calendar age. To test that hypothesis, he will try to extract haemoglobin from the specimen's bone marrow and compare the relative amounts of foetal versus adult haemoglobin proteins. The second possibility is that Ata, the size of a 22-week-old foetus, suffered from a severe form of a rare rapid ageing disease, progeria, and died in the womb or after premature birth.

Nolan hasn't yet turned up hits for genes known to be associated with progeria or dwarfism. He's stepping up the search for mutations through additional sequencing and casting a wider net. Another possibility is a teratogen: a birth defect-inducing toxicant along the lines of thalidomide. Nolan plans to analyse tissue using mass spectrometry to look for toxicants or metabolites. But reports of a handful of other Tom Thumb-sized skeletons from Russia and elsewhere have Nolan leaning toward a genetic explanation.

At least one expert has a more prosaic take-but agrees that the specimen is human. "This looks to me like a badly desiccated and mummified human foetus or premature stillbirth," says William Jungers, a palaeoanthropologist and anatomist at Stony Brook University Medical Centre in New York. He notes that "barely ossified and immature elements" of the hands and feet, and the wide open metopic suture, where the two frontal bones of the skull come together down the middle of the forehead. "Genetic anomalies are not evident, probably because there aren't any," he says. Nolan responds that the rib number and epiphyseal plate densities remain a riddle; while he is open to the foetus hypothesis, he thinks that the jury is still out.

Nolan's analysis went viral this week; besieged as he has been by the media circus, he doesn't regret having gotten involved in debunking a claim of alien life. "I'm thrilled with the outcome," he says. Once the analyses are complete, he says, he'll submit his findings for peer review. The other claim Nolan debunks is that Ata is an elaborate hoax. The X-rays clearly show these are real bones, complete with arterial shadows, he says. "You just couldn't fake it," he says, adding, with a laugh, "unless you were an alien."

This is adapted from ScienceNOW, the online daily news service of the journal Science.

10 comments

  • Ok checked date is not 1 April, still doesn't look real, elaborate hoax is my guess.

    Commenter
    Reeko
    Location
    Melb
    Date and time
    May 09, 2013, 8:41AM
    • This looks like an alien to me.

      Just have a look at that head. And it is missing ribs, and has fully/strange looking hands and feet.

      You have to remember, the US government will do anything to cover up the existence of aliens.

      Numerous documentaries like X-Files and the movie, Independence Day, have shown clearly, the lengths to which the western governments have covered up alien life.

      .

      Commenter
      Kam i Am
      Location
      iWork
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 9:47AM
    • @Kam I am, did you really take it seriously in Independence day when they were in the underground bunker in Rosewell and the president of the USA did not know they had aliens hidden there by a weird guy with long grey hair?

      Commenter
      Chop1
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 10:48AM
    • Argh... did either of you read the article, or did you just look at the pictures? Two highly qualified scientists say that it is real and is human. Sorry @Reeko and @ Kam i Am, but "I looked at the pictures and decided it's a hoax/alien" doesn't really carry any weight.

      Commenter
      Jez
      Location
      Melbourne
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 10:54AM
    • This is not a hoax, it is a real creature that lived and breathed and was about 7 when it died. The study was done by Stamford University by specialists in genetic sequencing and Dr Nolan who specializes in fetal abnormalities and displasia. there is further sequencing being done by 3 other institutes. 91% human DNA doesn't necessarily make it human. There are also 22 million base pairs that haven't been analysed as yet. Chimps are 98% so more needs to be done to verify what is going on here. IN short it took 10 years to sequence the human genome.Great article

      Commenter
      b3n777
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 11:16AM
    • @Kam - a couple of definitions, There's FICTION, which is where people make stuff up, and there's FACT, which is what is known to be true. Those references you cite? X-Files, Independence Day, etc, they're FICTION. Hope that helped clear things up a bit for you.

      Commenter
      Nefarious
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 11:17AM
    • @Chop1 | May 09, 2013, 10:48AM

      Did I take it seriously, you ask?

      Yes, Chop1, I took it very seriously.

      Commenter
      Kam i Am
      Location
      iWork
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 11:19AM
    • @b3n777
      You don't know what you're talking about.
      You can tell the difference between human and chimp DNA with a sequence of nucleotides about 1000bp in length from any part of the genome. You don't need to sequence the whole genome to see which one's which.
      Also, sequencing technology has come a very long way since the human genome project. A person's entire genome can be sequenced in less than a day with the latest tech.
      Source: I'm a molecular biologist.

      Commenter
      Honey Badger
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 11:54AM
    • Kam I Am - you characterise the X-Files as a documentary? What planet are you from? I loved the X-FIles, but really...

      Commenter
      Aussiebrewer
      Date and time
      May 09, 2013, 12:36PM
  • Happy April fools day

    Commenter
    theescapegoat
    Location
    Yarraville
    Date and time
    May 09, 2013, 8:43AM
    Comments are now closed
    Advertisement
    Featured advertisers
    Advertisement