JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Health expert urges change of heart over cars


Ewa Kretowicz

A healthier way to travel? Health expert believes breaking dependency on cars will improve Canberra's health.

A healthier way to travel? Health expert believes breaking dependency on cars will improve Canberra's health. Photo: Graham Tidy

Better urban planning would improve Canberrans' health, according to leading experts at the second Active Living forum yesterday.

The idea of a ''biophilic'' city design, which would move the city from car dependence, is being championed by the ACT Heart Foundation as another way to encourage locals to be active.

More than half of the territory's residents are overweight or obese and environment and sustainability expert Darren Bilsborough said prioritising public transport would have massive economic and health benefits.

The costs of obesity are growing and in 2008, the annual cost of being overweight in Australia, including health system costs, productivity declines and carers' costs, was estimated at about $58 billion.

The adjunct professor from Curtin University said his research showed people who commuted more than one hour to work each way experienced negative heath impacts, including depression and weight gain.

The solution was to rip up roads and use that space for trams and additional housing in city centres.

''You can have 240 people getting to work in 177 cars, or three buses, for that same amount of people on one tram,'' Professor Bilsborough said.

''When you get rid of cars, you need fewer roads and you can use that space for other things … There are lots of roads and lots of concrete and that's where [Canberra] falls over. The real issue is getting more people more active more quickly and to do that you need to get more cars off the road and get more public transport working,'' he said.

Professor Bilsborough said the ACT government should allocate priority bus lanes throughout the city.

''There has to be less preference to cars. You go to places like New York and London and it's very difficult to get around in a car; the preferential use is public transport,'' he said. Heart Foundation ACT chief executive Tony Stubbs said the ACT government's Transport for Canberra Strategy made the link between public transport and health.

It sets targets of 15-minute bus frequency on the territory's arterial roads and 30-minute public transport services within a 5-10 minute walk of every resident by 2021. Also, by 2016 the ACT government wants almost a quarter of all journeys to and from work to be on bike, foot or its upgraded public transport system - bus, tram or light rail.

Mr Stubbs said it was achievable if the government set aside funding in the June budget and to ''build physical activity into our days''.


  • Hear hear

    I must say
    sydney previously canberra
    Date and time
    May 09, 2012, 11:28AM
    • ummm but London and New York are super cities built before the advent of motor cars. Canberra's construction influences are more suburban US 1950s car culture and up until recently worked.

      Let's face it; apart from two blocks in the morning and afternoon there is not a traffic problem. Rather there is a perception that parking is an issue and the race is on to get a free parking space.

      Another argument is econ-rational. The support industry for cars in Canberra is large and undermining that with fewer vehicles per population will also have an effect on the ACT's ability to fund other initiatives for the people. An irrational but logical outcome.

      Outraged of Palmerston
      Date and time
      May 09, 2012, 1:56PM
      • Completely support a push for better urban planning and public transport systems, but really do fail to see how sitting on a bus as opposed to sitting in a car will have any difference to health.

        Date and time
        May 09, 2012, 3:21PM
        • People who catch public transport almost invariabliy walk a good deal more than those who drive. This has been borne out by research on the topic repeatedly. When you drive, you generally walk out to the driveway, and then from the parking lot to work or other destination like shopping. At least those catching public transport walk to the local stop. Incidental exercise, that is the exercise done as part of everyday living (as opposted to say orangised recreation like sports or gym) has been shown to be the only way most people will conistantly undertake regular exercise. People who drive everywhere really don't get much incidental exercise.

          I must say
          rozelle sydney
          Date and time
          May 10, 2012, 9:58AM
      Comments are now closed

      HuffPost Australia

      Follow Us

      Featured advertisers

      Special offers

      Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo