JavaScript disabled. Please enable JavaScript to use My News, My Clippings, My Comments and user settings.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

If you have trouble accessing our login form below, you can go to our login page.

Reward good bars, suggest hotels

Police on the beat at night near Civic nightclubs.

Police on the beat at night near Civic nightclubs. Photo: Rohan Thomson

  • Durham buckling under rising costs
  • Civic police seek boost in numbers to patrol trouble spots
  • Comment: Stop alcohol-fuelled violence - it's killing our youth
  • Civic remains a hotbed of alcohol-fuelled violence
  • How a senseless king hit changed a life forever
  • The hotels lobby has called for rewards for well-behaved bars, pubs and clubs, while urging the government to focus on supermarkets and liquor stores to prevent young revellers pre-loading on alcohol.

    The ACT government introduced drastically higher liquor licensing fees for licensed premises through its tough 2010 liquor reforms, with higher costs for those deemed to pose the most risk to the community.

    The fee structure had a financial impact on many venues, including Kingston's popular Holy Grail bar, which said the increased costs were a major reason for its closure in February this year.

    Less than a year after introducing the scheme, the government overhauled the fee structure to relieve the burden on smaller venues, which complained they were shouldering an unfair proportion of the fees.

    The Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education also found that the number of licensed venues seemed not to have changed since the new risk-based fee structure was introduced.

    The government is now conducting a review into the effectiveness of the 2010 reforms in their first two years of operation.

    The Australian Hotels Association ACT - which lobbies for pubs, bars, and clubs - has urged the government to review the fee structure.

    It says the current licensing fees, coupled with a sharp downturn in trade, are still hitting venues hard.

    ''It's been a really tough year, right across the board,'' general manager Brad Watts said.

    ''I spoke to four or five different licensees around town today, and they're down anywhere from 40 to 50 per cent this year, in terms of turnover,'' he said.

    The AHA believes alcohol-related crime has come down significantly in the ACT since the introduction of the 2010 reforms.

    But it has warned the fees are still placing an unfair burden on its members, an impact that had flowed through to the rest of the ACT economy.

    Mr Watts said the government must shift the onus onto large supermarkets and liquor retailers, which are selling alcohol in bulk at discounted prices and facilitating ''pre-loading'', or drinking to excess before revellers head out.

    ''We're seeing that as a major problem, people going out buying cheap, discounted alcohol before they go out, consuming it unsafely in an unregulated environment, car parks, outdoors, and then taking the problem indoors,'' Mr Watts said.

    ''What we want to see is the off-licence venues paying higher fees to cover that risk factor, because we don't really think that's been covered under the new act,'' he said.

    The AHA has also called for the introduction of a system which rewards well-behaved venues with lower fees if they prevent alcohol-fuelled offences.

    A similar ''star system'' has been introduced in Victoria, where licensees who do the right thing keep their star rating, and are rewarded.

    ''If there is a strong compliance, [if] you've followed the new act to the book, then there should be some sort of leniency given to us,'' Mr Watts said.

    Attorney-General Simon Corbell said the current two-year review into the effectiveness of the 2010 reforms would consider such a scheme.

    Mr Corbell said issues relating to pre-loading and off-licences would also be examined by the review.

    ''We will also be looking very closely at the issue of pre-loading and whether or not we need to adjust the licence structure when it comes to off-licences, who are selling cheap alcohol for people to pre-load before they come to the entertainment precinct,'' he said.

    2 comments so far

    • Preloading would virtually vanish over night if the preloaders were unable to be admitted to Canberra's late trading pubs and clubs.

      Studies by Prof. Peter Miller from Deakin Uni and FARE establish about two third of younger patrons engage in dangerous levels of preloading. Preloading is also the biggest predictor of consequential alcohol fuelled violence and related harms.

      I therefore support the AHA ACT push for much more effective controls against the unlimited supply of dirt cheap grog from bottleshops and the awful scourge of unwelcomed alcohol advertising that does adversely impact upon our kids.

      But the AHA and its members must also share responsibility instead of their modus operandi of shifting and deflecting all blame onto everybody else.

      Young people preload because of the cheap price. But we shouldn't forget they again load up on entry to these late trading premises who blatantly ignore RSA obligations.
      Let's help the poor licensees of late trading binge barns by the ACT Liquor Act setting a prescribed measurable definition intoxication - say .08.

      Condition of entering into all high risk premises be subject to a non intrusive breath screen. "Over .08 shut the gate" or be allowed entry but not served above low strength drinks.

      This would

      a. kill preloading stone dead
      b. enable consumption of alcohol in a more secure and controlled setting of a responsible licensed venue
      c. substantially reduce drink driving
      d. create a safer night economy that will encourage more people to attend licensed and other premises
      e. enhance the financial viability of safer and more responsible venues

      It's time ACT political leaders stop dancing to the beat of the AHA and bottle shop owners and put public and police safety ahead of pub profits. .

      Commenter
      Tony
      Date and time
      December 10, 2013, 11:06AM
      • Yep, deal the alcohol industry another blow. Let's kick 'em in the kneecaps again. The Health Department thought they were doing the right thing by banning smoking in public places and so all these home bars have popped up in garages all over town. These home bars are not ventilated at all, and certainly there is no practice of RSA, so you need to get the young people out and about again...it's called being social and hopefully along with being social comes responsibility. The alcopop tax did nothing to stop the youth drinking alcohol so putting up the prices again isn't going to fix it.

        Commenter
        Aussie hurting
        Date and time
        December 10, 2013, 9:46PM

        Make a comment

        You are logged in as [Logout]

        All information entered below may be published.

        Error: Please enter your screen name.

        Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

        Error: Please enter your comment.

        Error: Your Message must be less than 300 words.

        Post to

        You need to have read and accepted the Conditions of Use.

        Thank you

        Your comment has been submitted for approval.

        Comments are moderated and are generally published if they are on-topic and not abusive.

        Related Coverage

        Featured advertisers

        Special offers

        Credit card, savings and loan rates by Mozo