Tram detracts from needs

Updated April 24 2018 - 9:23pm, first published September 26 2016 - 6:20pm

Richard Denniss needs to invent straw-man arguments against the tram because he hasn't understood the modelling in its environmental impact statement ("Growth, tram on way", September 24, Forum p10). His guessed premise from which benefits flow is that the tram provides convenient, green, congestion-busting transport, whereas Capital Metro's documents show the opposite is the case on all three counts: less than half the seats in peak periods, an unrepayable greenhouse construction debt and increased traffic congestion compared to "business as usual".

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Canberra news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.