Pell's lawyers list 13 reasons why jury verdict was 'unreasonable'

By Adam Cooper
Updated June 5 2019 - 10:08am, first published 9:33am

George Pell's lawyers have outlined 13 reasons why a jury should have had a reasonable doubt before they found the 77-year-old guilty of sexually assaulting two choirboys at St Patrick's Cathedral in the 1990s.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.


(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options

Get the latest Canberra news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.