Much is being made about federal Liberal MP Julian Leeser's decision to resign from the Coalition's shadow ministry because he does not agree with his leader, and presumably, most of his colleagues, regarding their stance on the forthcoming referendum.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
Julian Leeser himself says he remains a loyal Liberal.
This seems at odds with his behaviour, which is undermining his leader's standing and his party's unity, causing policy confusion at a time when the Liberal Party is in need to clarify exactly what it's for and against.
That Mr Leeser is now going to support the government's wording of the proposed referendum, which he has previously said is unacceptable, also seems odd.
Of course, why any party member break ranks is rarely straightforward. It is usually a mixture of personal ambition, ego, and opportunism wrapped in a thin texture of principles sometimes hard to identify.
Leeser is lucky he is in the Liberal Party where such divergences of opinion, including even crossing the floor in Parliament against their own government's proposals, can usually be done without fear of immediate expulsion or suspension - unless you are in the Victorian Liberal Party of course.
Failure to toe the Labor party line usually results in expulsion or suspension. Hence, few Labor members cross the floor in Parliament. Between 1950-2019, of all the federal parliamentarians who crossed the floor against their own party only 3 per cent were Labor members.
READ MORE:
And certainly there are precedents for Liberals to oppose their own party's referendum proposals. In 1977, a small number of Liberals opposed the Fraser government's referendum for the simultaneous elections of the House of Representatives and Senate. The problem was they were being asked to support the very same referendum attempted by the Whitlam Labor government in 1974 that the Coalition had opposed and easily defeated.
At that time, the only Fraser-government officeholder, and a minor one, not even appointed by the prime minister, who opposed the simultaneous election referendum was Queensland Senator Kathy Martin Sullivan.
She resigned her position as deputy government whip in the Senate and joined with the Bjelke-Petersen government in Queensland in opposing the simultaneous election proposal. The Liberal Western Australian government and the Liberal opposition in Tasmania also opposed that referendum which subsequently failed.
While the Liberal Party has been more accepting of their parliamentarians exercising their conscience and breaking ranks from time to time, no party can tolerate too much of this selfish behaviour. If it persists, a party ceases to be a party. Tactically, no party can survive the cut and thrust of day-to-day politics with such disunity. No party can attract support if it lacks a coherent and consistent policy stance because some members want to exercise their own personal predilections on this issue or that.
The founder of the Liberal Party, Robert Menzies, while appreciative of the need for tolerance of individual choice, was adamant that his new party would not follow in the footsteps of its predecessors where personal ambition overrode party unity. As he said: "If you were to look at the history of non-Labour politics ... you will find it profoundly marred, and ... ruined by disunity. We will not deserve to succeed until we have achieved loyalty and unity."
Leeser's recent actions shows no loyalty to his leader, his parliamentary colleagues and most importantly, to long suffering Liberal supporters who are tired of the party's policy of appeasement during the last nine years in office. Nor does Leeser's actions contribute to the Liberal Party's unity.
Julian Leeser, former head of the Menzies Research Centre, should know his party's history better. He would be wise while on the backbench to spend that extra time not campaigning against his party but reading his Menzies to see what the Liberal Party and grown-up politics is all about.
- Dr Scott Prasser has worked for three federal cabinet ministers and recently published the chapter, Menzies: The Learning Leader (and Why He Kept on Winning).
We've made it a whole lot easier for you to have your say. Our new comment platform requires only one log-in to access articles and to join the discussion on The Canberra Times website. Find out how to register so you can enjoy civil, friendly and engaging discussions. See our moderation policy here.
