It was, all too briefly, a glimpse at what parenting would look like if childcare were free.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
For those still working, the April 2 announcement was a temporary weight off the shoulders, a lessening of the burden of household spending, a chance to save a bit of money.
For those in job strife and kids too young to go to school, it was a chance to breathe.
But, as we learnt on Monday, it's all about to come to an end.
Announcing the end of the free childcare measure, federal education minister Dan Tehan said demand for childcare places was increasing again, prompting the "new transition phase".
"No one imagined two months ago that we would be in the position that we are," he said.
READ MORE:
"I think most people, most experts, thought it would take at least four to six months for us to be in this position.
"So what we must do is now put in a system, in place, that enables us to transition, to be able to deal with the extra demand that is coming into the system and that is what this package is designed to do."
So, the package turned out to be very limited indeed.
And the fact remains that childcare in Australia is eye-wateringly expensive and, in some places, not easy to come by.
It's a system that disproportionately affects women, because it has lasting ramifications on the career of whichever parent chooses to take out of the workforce - most often women.
It's also staffed by a low-paid workforce made up, overwhelmingly, by women - women who nevertheless are expected to study for and maintain particular qualifications.
And the fact remains that childcare in Australia is eye-wateringly expensive and, in some places, not easy to come by.
Of course, the period of reprieve came about as the result of something far more horrifying and all-consuming than sacrificed career progression, long-term costs and a criminally underpaid workforce, but the point of this state of affairs is that it was always going to be temporary.
Australia may now be emerging from the COVID crisis, blinking in the light and counting ourselves relatively lucky that we haven't been nearly as adversely affected as many other developed nations.
But women will still have to decide whether they can afford to keep the kids in childcare, and childcare workers will still be vastly underpaid, never mind that they will no longer be able to access the Jobkeeper payments.
As has been with the case with many facets of modern life over the past three months, the childcare sector could have been the subject of a period of intense reckoning.
The government had the chance to reassess the system - broken, layered over with the vinegar-and-brown-paper solutions of complicated subsidies, knotted into the already overwrought welfare system, all administered by the giant tangle that is Centrelink. But it didn't.
The brief reprieve was designed only to get the sector through the crisis. And now it looks to be going back to the way it was.
It's a shame, especially because it's clear that better systems exist. In many European countries, for example, children begin school - and formal education - at the age of three, and all schooling is free.
There's plenty of research showing that children who attend preschool benefit enormously.
In Australia, there are limited options for working parents, even when it comes to government subsidised preschools - two to three days a week - making it clear, in case anyone was in doubt, that the government would prefer at least one parent to stay at home for some of the time in the years before formal school begins.
It's another opportunity lost.
